KUTCH SCIENCE FOUNDATION Dr Bhudia said...
Think about, Who named it a 1.75 billion year old Precambrian Vishnu Schist ? What is the Meaning of the Vishnu Schist (Shishtha)? why is 1.75 billion to 1.99 bn year old? Search on it !! we can haves a full lecture on the subject !
And there is also Kutch , called Kutch Colorado from where the Colorado river flows to Grand Canyon ! The Indian tribe is called Kachi, means Mother land – original Tribes from India
Most visitors to the Grand Canyon and Colorado river just visit the place as tourist to enjoy the beauty of the river valley. But geologist need to go to the bottom of the valley of the river Colorado grand canyon. One Need to go to Bottom of the grand canyon rafting the river Colorado. so the can really visualise the all layers of the Grand canyon and most interesting is it's base layer called Vishnu Schist MOUNTAIN LAYER.
Why it is Called VISHNU Schist mountain layer? name is given by original tribes of the Red Indians, original GENETICALLY decedents of Asian origin. though they went there about 20,000 years ago by land when north Atlantic was frozen. They believe this place of their worshiping god.
The VISHNU Mountain is geologically about 1.7 to 1.8 Bn years (Marine BACTERIAL STROMATOLITES developed before this time 1.99 Bn years in the SEA when land was the under water dating back to this time 1.99Bn years) old and was 9km height even higher than everest. same as PURANs suggest the timing of the "LAND MASS COME OUT OF THE SEA during VARAH AVATAR" first incarnation was MATSHYA - Fish in the SEA (geologically and methologically according the calculation in PURAN as well, the oldest vertebrate on the Earth) and then was the VARAH Incarnation of The LORD VISHNU which hooked out the LAND MASS from the sea by TOOTH tusk.
Now let’s check with calculative PURAN Calendar to compare the geology. Though will be difficult to calculate without good maths.
SHRUSTI START(ARAMBHA) TIME 47400 x 360 1.71E+07 17064000
TIL PRESENT SATYAYUGA 1.95E+09 1953720000
PASSED TRETAYUGA 1296000
PASSED DWAPARYUGA 864000
PRESENT KALIYUGA PASSED YEARS 5119
AT AD 2009 FROM KALP START(ARAMBHA)TIME 1.97E+09 1972949119
Though it was a mountain but now is at the bottom layer of all sediment layers of the valley! How that might have happened? a documentary will be help full to understand this process of millions of years .
The major geologic exposures in the Grand Canyon range in age from the 2 billion year old Vishnu Schist at the bottom of the Inner Gorge to the 230 million year old Kaibab Limestone on the Rim. Interestingly, there is a gap of about one billion years between the stratum that is about 500 million years old and the lower level, which is about 1.5 billion years old. That indicates a period of erosion between two periods of deposition.
An exhibit with different rock layers cut out from a canyon wall. Grand Canyon's three sets of rocks, showing lithology, age and thickness of individual units. For more information on the geology of each of the formations exposed in Grand Canyon see these USGS sites: Grand Canyon and Colorado Plateau.
Where Vishnu is His third VARAH incarnation when earth came out of sea water.
Schist - means in SANSKRIT - remnant (remainder)
Vishnu schist means the remnant of the first land which came out of the sea water during the Vishnu’s third VARAH incarnation
CALCULATION match with geological time scale
SHRUSTI START(ARAMBHA) TIME as PURANs say
47400 Divya Vrash (cosmic years) x 360 (ratio of cosmic and human earth years) = 1.71E+07
17064000 + TIL PRESENT LAST SATYAYUGA =1.95E+09
=1953720000 +PASSED TRETAYUGA 1296000+Dwapar Yuga 864000+ KALI years 5119=1972949119 =1.97Bn years
RADIOISOTOPE DATING OF THE GRAND CANYON ROCKS:
ANOTHER DEVASTATING FAILURE FOR LONG-AGE GEOLOGY
Deep inside the Inner Gorge of Grand Canyon, northern Arizona, are the crystalline basements rocks that probably date back even to the Creation Week itself. Clearly visible in the canyon walls are the light-colored granites, such as the Zoroaster Granite, which are stark against the darker, folded strata of the Vishnu Schist and the other metamorphic rock units of the Granite Gorge Metamorphic Suite1 (see lowest purple and green shading in diagram). These are former sedimentary and volcanic strata that have been transformed by heat and pressure, possibly during the intense upheavals when the dry land was formed on Day 3 of Creation Week.2 Among these metamorphosed volcanic strata are amphibolites, belonging to the Brahma Schist. These were originally basalt lava flows several meters to tens of meters thick. In some outcrops pillow structures have been preserved, testimony to the basalt lavas having originally erupted and flowed under water onto the Creation Week ocean floor. Metamorphic rocks are not always easy to date using radioisotopes. Results obtained usually signify the “date” of the metamorphism, but they may also yield the
2) “age” of the original volcanic (or sedimentary) rock. The “age” or “date” is calculated from the amount of the daughter isotope produced by radioactive decay of the parent isotope. In Grand Canyon, the “date” of metamorphism of the basalt lavas to form these Brahma amphibolites has been determined as 1690-1710 Ma (million years ago), based on U-Pb dating of minerals in the overlying Vishnu Schist and underlying Rama Schist that formed during the metamorphism.3,4 It is also claimed that the original basalt lavas were erupted between 1741 and 1750 Ma, based on U-Pb dating of “original” zircon grains in metamorphosed felsic (granitic) volcanic layers within the Brahma and Rama Schists.4,5
Twenty-seven Brahma amphibolite samples were collected from various Inner Gorge outcrops as part of the RATE (Radioisotopes and the Age of The Earth) project. These included seven samples from a 150 meter long and 2 meter wide amphibolite body outcropping just upstream from the mouth of Clear Creek at river mile 84 (measured from Lees Ferry). All 27 samples were sent to two well-credentialed internationallyrecognized, commercial laboratories for radioisotope analyses—potassium-argon (KAr) at a Canadian laboratory, and rubidium-strontium (Rb-Sr), samarium-neodymium (Sm-Nd), and lead-lead (Pb-Pb), at an Australian laboratory. Both laboratories use standard, best-practice procedures on state-of-the-art equipment.
The model K-Ar ages for each of the samples ranged from 405.1±10 Ma to 2574.2±73 Ma. Furthermore, the seven samples from the small amphibolite unit near Clear Creek, which should all be the same age because they belong to the same metamorphosed basalt lava flow, yielded K-Ar model ages ranging from 1060.4±28 Ma to 2574.2±73 Ma. This includes two samples only 0.84 meters apart that yielded K-Ar model ages of 1205.3±31 and 2574.2±73 Ma. The computer program Isoplot6 was used to plot isochrons and calculate isochron ages from the other radioisotope analyses. The best isochron plots, where all the variation from the line of best fit to the data incorporates all
the analytical errors, yielded an Rb-Sr isochron age of 1240±84 Ma, an Sm-Nd isochron age of 1655±40 Ma, and a Pb-Pb isochron age of 1883±53 Ma.
Most people believe that when the different radioisotope dating methods are used on the same rock unit they all yield the same age. However, the radioisotope dating of these Grand Canyon rocks clearly demonstrates that the disagreement, or isochron discordance,
is pronounced. Even when the calculated error margins are taken into account the different radioisotope dating methods yield completely different “ages” that cannot be reconciled—1240±84 Ma (Rb-Sr), 1655±40 Ma (Sm-Nd), and 1883±53 Ma (Pb-Pb)
(see diagram). None of the obtained isochron “ages” corresponds to the “date” for any recognized event, neither the original lava eruptions nor the subsequent metamorphism. And the K-Ar model “ages” are so widely divergent from one another (ranging from 405.1±10 Ma to 2574.2±73 Ma), even from very closely spaced samples from the same outcrop of the same original lava flow, as to be useless for “dating” any event.
Yet the RATE research has uncovered much evidence, including the patterns of these discordances between the “dates” from the different radioisotope systems,10 that radioisotope decay rates were accelerated in a global catastrophic event in the recent past.11 For example, if accelerated radioisotope decay occurred, then alpha-decaying radioisotopes would yield older isochron “ages” than beta-decaying radioisotopes, which is exactly the pattern in the Brahma amphibolites (see diagram above). Because the different radioisotopes are dating the same geologic event, to have produced different “dates” has to mean that the parent radioisotopes have decayed at different rates over the same time period. In other words, the decay of the parent radioisotopes was accelerated by different amounts, the decay of those yielding older “ages” (the alpha-decayers) having been accelerated more. Obviously, if radioisotope decay was accelerated, say during the Genesis Flood, then the radioisotope decay “clocks” could never be relied upon to “date” rocks as many millions of years old. To the contrary, the rocks could still only be a few thousand years old.
The radioisotope methods, long touted as irrefutably dating the earth’s rocks as countless millions of years old, have repeatedly failed to provide reliable and meaningful absolute ages for Grand Canyon rock layers. Irreconcilable disagree- The isochron “ages” yielded by the different parent radioisotopes for the Brahma amphibolites plotted against the present half -lifes (decay rates) of those radioisotopes according to their mode of decay (.Note that there is total disagreement between the “dates,” and the alpha-decay “dates” are much older than the beta-decay “date.”)