What is diffrence between OBC Creamy and Non Creamy?

5 Answers

  • ma b
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago
    Favourite answer

    Creamy layer politics

    P RadhakrishnanFirst Published : 30 Oct 2008 11:47:00 PM ISTLast Updated : 30 Oct 2008 09:15:51 AM ISTOne step forward, two back’ is perhaps the most apt shibboleth for India’s ongoing reservation rigmarole. To begin at the beginning, in the Supreme Court rulings of November 16, 1992 in Indra Sawhney and Others vs. Union of India, eight out of the nine judges decided to exclude the advanced sections from the OBCs. Their reasoning was: in a backward class if the connecting link is social backwardness, it should broadly be the same in a given class; if some members are far too advanced socially (which in the context necessarily means economically and, may also mean educationally) the connecting thread between them and the remaining class snaps; they would be misfits in the class; after excluding them alone,would the class be a compact class; and in fact, such exclusion benefits the truly backward.

    Six of the judges also cautioned that exclusion should not be merely on economic basis (means test or income ceiling), but on the basis of social advancement so as to ensure that the exclusion test does not affect the really backward among the OBCs.

    The political chicanery of the Centre in the subsequent years has deprived the really backward OBCs of reservation benefits.

    For this, the means test chosen has been precisely what the judiciary has avoided.

    The Centre’s justification for its decision of February 4, 2004, to hike the income ceiling for determining the ‘creamy layer’ among the OBCs from Rs. 1 lakh to Rs. 2.5 lakhs a year was that it was in line with the recommendations of the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC). But the NCBC did not have any data to support its recommendations.

    In less than five years after the hike in income ceiling and without any evaluation of its impact on the OBCs, the Centre decided on October 4, 2008, to raise the income criterion for the creamy layer from Rs.2.5 lakhs to Rs. 4.5 lakhs a year. The Centre’s argument that this would help in bringing more people under the reservation category and help students seeking admission under the Central Educational Institutions Act, 2006, which provides 27 per cent reservation for the OBCs, is prima facie misleading.

    For one thing, there has not been any economic revolution in the country in the last four years that would affect the OBCs as a category and warrant such a huge hike in the income criterion. For another, as OBCs are a disparate socio-economic ensemble, the effects of the factors supposedly taken into consideration by the NCBC need to be assessed in a disaggregated manner.

    That takes this write-up to four larger issues which the Centre has all along ignored: (a) losing sight of the rationale for elimination of the creamy layer; (b) use of income ceiling when multiple tests are possible, and use of “non-creamy layer” certificate when the “non-creamy layer” status should ideally be arrived at through multiple tests; (c) need for addressing the unequal regional effects of reservations; and (d) continuing neglect of the SCs and STs.

    Of the first, it was probably Justice V R Krishna Iyer who coined “creamy layer” in State of Kerala v. N M Thomas (1976). He observed that the experience of reservation in practice showed that the benefits were snatched away by the top creamy layer of the backward classes, thus keeping the weakest amongst weak always weak and leaving the fortunate layers to consume the whole cake; and that the claim for reservation by the backward class was ‘overplayed extravagantly’ by large and vocal groups whose burden of backwardness had been substantially lightened by the march of time, measures of better education and more opportunities of employment. These observations are more relevant today than in the 1970s.

    Related to these observations is the following definition of creamy layer by the Justice R N Prasad Creamy Layer Identification Committee appointed by the Centre following the Supreme Court rulings of November 16, 1992: “The Committee defined the ‘creamy layer’ as when a person has been able to shed off the attributes of social and educational backwardness and has secured employment or has engaged himself in some trade/ profession of high status and at which stage he is normally no longer in need of reservation.”What the Centre should have addressed and the judiciary should have been convinced about is whether sections of OBCs have shed off the attributes of social and educational backwardness as disabilities of their castes.

    The Prasad Committee had given multiple criteria under six broad categories for identifying the creamy layer: Children of: (a) Those who hold constitutional posts; (b) Group A (Class I officers) and Group B (Class II services) including employees holding equivalent posts in PSUs, banks, insurance companies and universities; (c) Officers of the armed forces of the rank of colonel or an equivalent post and above; (d) P

  • dunkel
    Lv 4
    4 years ago

    Obc Creamy

  • 4 years ago

    The creamy layer is a term used in Indian politics to refer to the relatively wealthier and better educated members of the Other Backward Classes (OBCs) who are not eligible for government sponsored educational and professional benefit programs. The term was introduced by the Sattanathan Commission in 1971, which directed that the "creamy layer" should be excluded from the reservations (quotas) of civil posts and services granted to the OBCs. The creamy layer criteria was introduced at Rs 1 lakh in 1993, and revised to Rs 2.5 lakh in 2004, Rs 4.5 lakh in 2008 and Rs 6 lakh in 2013.

    In October 2015, National Commission for Backward Classes proposed the that a person belonging to OBC with an annual family income of up to Rs 1 lakh should be considered as minimum ceiling for OBC.

    NCBC also recommended the sub-division of OBCs into 'backward', 'more backward' and 'extremely backward' blocs and divide 27% quota amongst them in proportion to their population, to ensure that stronger OBCs don't corner the quota benefits

  • Amit
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    Creamy Layer means people in OBC who have annual income more than a specified limit by the government. The government reservation policy is not applicable to OBC creamy layer.

  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • Anonymous
    5 years ago

    For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/axBmb

    The creamy layer is a term used in Indian politics to refer to the wealth and education of the people. Other Backward Classes (OBCs) are the people who are not eligible for government sponsored educational and professional benefit programs. Non OBCs are the persons can apply against reserved vacancies for appointment to posts/admission to central educational institutions (CEIs), under the Government of India. I think this would help you better.

Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.