Which one is far less demanding? it is not as clean and answer as i'm particular you will like. Macroeconomics, for lots of persons, is extra intuitive, and is composed of issues you have witnessed inadvertantly by using your existence. because of this inherent familiarity, that's frequently seen the better of the two classes. Microeconomics is composed of thoughts you do use, yet require slightly extra thought to attain they are there maximum cases. by way of deeper diving required to narrate to it, that is frequently considered because of the fact the extra no longer basic. finally, the convenience of the direction will count on your professor and how nicely they are able to get you engaged and involved, so ask some scholars who've taken the two as to the kinds of the two instructors. If that is a similar instructor, i might probable default you to macro. Math: sure math is used for the two, in spite of the undeniable fact that it is not something too perplexing. My college required calculus in uncomplicated terms for our progressed econ instructions, or perhaps then we did no longer use it lots. maximum math you will discover is quite basic, and is frequently extra conceptual in nature to instruct relationships (i.e. the slop of a call for line signifying that is elasticity... or y=mx+b).