Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Arts & HumanitiesBooks & Authors · 6 months ago

Is Wikipedia a reliable source?

18 Answers

Relevance
  • 6 months ago
    Favorite Answer

    No, It's not. There's a lot of misinformation.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • 6 months ago

    Most of it is, but not enough to use it as a connection on term papers or a scientific report.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • Marli
    Lv 7
    6 months ago

    Some entries are and some are not. Wikipedia will warn readers with a "buyer beware sort of notice" if, in its opinion, the entry seems iffy or needs citations. Check the citations provided at the bottom of the article. Don't take it as the only source unless you can't find others, and even then, be skeptical.

    Rule of reference librarians: find two or more sources for every answer you give.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • Sharon
    Lv 6
    6 months ago

    depends. Scientific and literary articles are usually good, although in a famous incident Philip Roth pointed out an error in the article about one of his books, and the editor rejected his correction as being from an undependable source! Deep history normally is safe. Problem is occasional trolls will deliberately mess up an article and you see it before it is corrected, and political, commercial and religious articles are vulnerable.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • 6 months ago

    Partially reliable, as contribution can be made by anyone.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • 6 months ago

    I would check the sources because anyone can and do provide information on the site.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • 6 months ago

    It's as accurate as the information it collects. Nothing is infallible.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • 6 months ago

    i think it is, without it many online would be lost.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • Nancy
    Lv 6
    6 months ago

    It is when you are using material that appears as sourced and you have investigated that source, so the same as anything else.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • .
    Lv 7
    6 months ago

    No.

    But the claim that "anyone can edit it" is somewhat overstated. The are protections in place against vandalism. If you're looking for a basic fact, it's usually correct. But don't use Wikipedia in a formal research paper.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • Thomas
    Lv 4
    6 months ago

    Since it can be edited by anyone, no.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.