NiJo
Lv 6
NiJo asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 8 months ago

I heard in the impeachment inquiries that hear say testimony can be better than first hand testimony. Any legal scholars explain this?

8 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    5 months ago

                            

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Mike
    Lv 7
    8 months ago

    That is stupid liberal logic

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 8 months ago

    Lol, that was the most ridiculous statement from a member of Congress in history.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Anonymous
    8 months ago

    I happy to hear that trump will be testifying.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • larry1
    Lv 6
    8 months ago

    You do not need a legal scholar....it is a farce....a one only party partisan pillory.....They make up their own fake rules because they have a 5% majority in the House. No other human in Congress votes with what the democratic party is doing to Trump and the US government.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 8 months ago

    A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • David
    Lv 7
    8 months ago

    Well, it might be if the person giving first hand testimony is lying, but that's about it.  Otherwise, it's the old phone game.  The story changes so much from the original that it's unrecognizable.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Anonymous
    8 months ago

    Sure Google them..............

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.