How come non white nations like China, Japan, Mexico, Brazil, India are more famous than white nations like Poland, Austria,Sweden,Norway?
Slovenia, Hungary, Czech, Ukraine? How come dark people are more relevant than Blonde ones?
- MarkLv 72 weeks ago
The only "white" nations I know of would
possibly be greenland & any country in the
arctic circle so I've no clue what you're
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
,,, ,,, ,,, ,,, ,,, ,,, ,,, ,,, ,,, ,,,
- reme_1Lv 72 weeks ago
What the heck are you complaining about?
- Anonymous2 weeks ago
So what are we comparing here, hair color or skin color? Are you suggesting the populations of China, Japan, Mexico, Brazil and India are somehow interlinked?
To trick people, you need to say something that at least looks logical, you're just picking things at random.
- ObserverLv 72 weeks ago
I would say it has much to do with the advances development of the society or perhaps the economic development or even the political history
- What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
- Myke TaisunLv 42 weeks ago
That's because of their culture, food and traditions which are very different.
- ZirpLv 72 weeks ago
surely haircolour is the only factor that could be responsible
- PetterLv 73 weeks ago
Size and population play a big part in it. How can you compare one billion chinese or indians, with 5-10 millions in Norway, Austria and Sweden?
It's like comparing your local bookstore with Amazon. =)
- Anonymous3 weeks ago
Because you probably live in the Americas. If you lived in Europe you would rarely hear about Mexico or Brazil. You hear about China and India, because they have 1.5 billion people (Norway has 10 million). It's not a fair comparison.
- 3 weeks ago
Because more news worthy events occur in these countries.