Is art necessary for society?

10 Answers

Relevance
  • Raja
    Lv 7
    4 weeks ago

    Art is necessary for society. People who see art in everything loves the world and the society. When their point of view merges with moral and justice their minds attain greatness.

  • John P
    Lv 7
    1 month ago

    It seems so. Evidence of early human 'artworks', if only some form of deliberate decoration of everyday objects, stretches back many tens of thousands of years.

  • Jack
    Lv 5
    2 months ago

    No. Art necessarily emerges. 

  • gerald
    Lv 7
    2 months ago

    Its becoming less important  every day we can get machines to create everything now the virus has proved how much we need each other , we create music art everything with machines and the world is Einstein wth google we are making ourselves redundant as the machines race ahead scared to death of the Chinese 5G thats leaving us behind how ppathetic we have become 

  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • 2 months ago

    I believe it is necessary for humanity, thus it is in a society's best interest to support it.

  • Anonymous
    2 months ago

    So say the Elitists, and their pets.

    Democrats wanted to delay the peoples money because of the need to finance the Arts and a DC Music Hall.

  • Anonymous
    2 months ago

    Yes. Its necessary because its bound to happen.

  • 2 months ago

    Of Course it is the closest we can come to creation

  • 2 months ago

    Yes.

    Any society worth living in, anyway.

  • 2 months ago

    People could probably survive without it but it would be very unnatural. I don't think people would be happy without entertainment, creativity or ways to express themselves.

Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.