Should the new justice not be nominated until the election is over? ?
- Jas BLv 71 month ago
The Republicans refused to consider a Supreme Court Judge in March of presidential election, their hypocrisy is astounding.
- PhilLv 61 month ago
The dems are saying that she said " until a NEW president is elected. Ie not Trump.
I do not believe that the great woman said that- not for a second.
It is one big lie and totally disgusting.
- wonderingLv 41 month ago
it was Ruth's wish to have her replacement after the election once again trump is showing his disreguard for any body
- JakeLv 41 month ago
She should be both nominated and confirmed before the election.
- What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
- Anonymous1 month ago
@IOM: Can you show me the word "immediately" in the appointments clause?
"... and [the President] shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments."
- Mr Bill BLv 51 month ago
No. Just Because Dems want it true way. No law say's it has to be after election
- JuanaLv 71 month ago
That was the 2016 GOP rule.
Republicans in 2020: "Our own rule means nothing to us."
Also Republicans in 2020: "Vote for us."
Good luck with that.
- IOMLv 71 month ago
No. The Constitution mandates the President to appoint a replacement immediately.