What do you think about this saying evolution is debunked and everything is by design meaning a Creator?
- nineteenthlyLv 71 month ago
HOX exists, so far as I know, in all bilateral metazoa, but is reversed in protostomes relative to deuterostomes. To me that's powerful evidence for common ancestry. It shows the unity of those two clades and their connection. It's also deeply insulting to describe autism as a disease.
- PaulLv 71 month ago
Evolution can be rejected by ignorant people, but it cannot be "debunked". It is one of the most thoroughly understood natural processes that exist. We understand it much better then we understand gravity. Which has absolutely nothing to do with the reality of the Creator. If things didn't exist, they couldn't evolve.
- Anonymous1 month ago
Before the flood everything lived ten times longer, that's why tusks, antlers, fangs, trees, bugs and reptiles grew huge. Reptiles never stop growing as long as they live. Dinosaurs were simply massive lizards that lived to be very old.
Fossils were created when minerals entered the tissues of plants and animals, turning them into stone. The mud also solidified as it compressed under the weight of billions of tons of water. Stone cannot be dated: once around the sun is a year; you cannot hold up a rock and decide how many times it has been around the sun.
When a fish dies it rots or gets eaten. It does NOT turn into a fossil. But there are fish fossils everywhere on the planet, even on the tops of mountains.
Every fossil is the result of the world wide flood. Period. We did not evolve.
The Bible says God gave "green things" to the creatures before the flood: they were herbavores; nothing ate meat. You’ll never find the fossilized remains of any land animal with the remnants of another animal in it’s stomach. It was only after the flood that God decreed that meat would be added to the menu (possibly for population control).
Tigers are born without teeth. Sabertoothed tigers were not born that way. We tell how old a tiger is by the length of their fangs. The pre-flood tigers lived for hundreds of years.
Before the flood the world was like a terrarium: air extracted from bubbles trapped in fossilized sap prove the air had 50% more oxygen pre-flood. Everything lived longer because of the air quality and relatively perfect atmosphere. Adam lived until he was 930. Noah was 600 when he built the ark.
The real ark of Noah has been a tourist attraction in Turkey since the 70's. Look it up. It landed exactly where the Bible says it did, "in the mountains of Ararat", as in "the mountainous region known as Ararat....". Not ON Mount Ararat. It never said that.
You've heard of bacteria 'evolving'? No such thing: simply, the hardier bacteria were never killed off by the antibiotic in the first place. The weaker bacteria were. All that's left is 'resistant' bacteria. They were never subject to antibiotics to begin with. They never 'evolved'.
Trees like this one are found all over the world. They were buried upright during the flood. You don’t think it grew through ‘billions of years of rock’ do you?
- Anonymous1 month ago
Evolution can't be debunked and it doesn't invalidate the Creator. He set the process in motion.
- What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
- sk8terboy1963Lv 41 month ago
ANYONE who could successfully debunk the Theory of Evolution would become instantly famous not to mention wealthy beyond their dreams. This is nothing more than the same tired BS that Creationist/Intelligent Design people have been spewing for a long time. Evolution is an even more supported than the theory of gravity. It is a scientific fact. It happened. It is still happening. The trouble with religion is that anything that tends to challenge their ancient superstitious woo woo is instantly labeled as false. It is dishonest to assert as fact that which is not evidently true. Yet that is what religion does. It constantly tries to assert as fact things that we already know are not true or even possible. Religion is an assumed conclusion based on suspect claims from dubious sources supported by logical fallacies nested within circular reasoning bringing you back to the assumed conclusion. There is no truth in it. Never has been. Not one single person in human history has EVER provided proof and evidence of a deity.........ANY deity.
- Tony BLv 41 month ago
It seems to be written by a person who knows little of what they are writing about and, like quite a few people who post here, doesn't grasp what “evolution” is.
Evolution is the name given to the processes whereby living organisms change over time, from generation to generation. Covid 19 and the new mutations of it are the result of evolution.
There is no doubt that”evolution exists” and people have been aware of it for thousands of years (well, I guess that should be “most people”!).
- Pirate AM™Lv 71 month ago
First of all, taking a screenshot of a wall of text, rather than copy and pasting it does not lend any creditability. Second the grammar is atrocious and suggests that the original writer has a very poor comprehension as does the content.
Frankly, it's nothing more than some regurgitated "facts" wrapped with a lot of unsupported and unwarranted assumptions and the conclusion do not remotely correspond with what we know about genetics.
- antoniusLv 71 month ago
You can't even convince yourself, and surely you don't understand what you tried to write down. The question really is; where were you when you missed the last train? You show that you are functioning on cult belief, and believe that you need to worship something that you know nothing about, but you continue trying to make yourself feel safe by peddling foolishness.
- Pearl LLv 71 month ago
i think they might be right
- Anonymous1 month ago
The person who wrote that has no biological understanding whatsoever, and is entirely unqualified to weigh in on evolution. Evolution is not debunked any more than gravity is. These are established facts of science, and your desperate attempts to find a flaw in the science are just that; desperate attempts. If you're confident that there's a creator, great. Go with that. You don't need proof that a god exists, obviously, because if you did need proof you wouldn't believe that a god exists. So if you don't need proof, you also don't have to try to disprove it. Unless of course your insecurity in the existence of a god is substantial. Is it? Because you surely spend a lot of time trying to disprove evolution and failing. It's an odd thing to do if you're sure about your god belief. I mean, what's the point? What purpose do you think it serves?